Inovação inclusiva e singularidades : um estudo com licenciados de ciências biológicas da UFS

• Ano de defesa: 2017
• Autor(a) principal: Santana, Aline Mendonça
• Orientador(a): Pagan, Alice Alexandre
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Sergipe
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Ciências e Matemática
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Ensino de biologia; Formação de professores; Ensino superior; Estudantes universitários > Sergipe; Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Inclusão; Inovação; Políticas afirmativas
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Inclusion; Teacher training; Innovation; Affirmative policies
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO
• Link de acesso: https://ri.ufs.br/handle/riufs/5124

Inclusive educational innovation is understood here as a product, for example a didactic material, or process, as an event or a methodology, resulting from actions developed by a student, from the awareness of their singularities, aiming at amplifying their possibilities of development in An educational context. We understand that through the discussion of singularities, aiming at empowering innovation, it is possible for the licenciando to be protagonist of the inclusion itself. Thus, our objective was to identify possible student singularities understanding their relation with proposals of inclusive innovation for students of the Biological Sciences course, licenciatura, of the Federal University of Sergipe. Our methodology was given through the collection of 6 individual interviews, with subjects of both sexes, students the referred course, who accepted to participate. The corpus of material recorded and transcribed was interpreted by thematic analysis of Bardin content, from categories constructed a posteriori. The most cited singularity and presented by all the interviewees was socioeconomic. Other singularities presented were those of gender and sexuality and ethnic- racial. The students' conception of innovation points to an opposition between innovative and conservative. All are reported to be innovative in teaching, but this innovation is usually linked to didactic materials and methodologies. In the innovation gradient most of the students are ideally, they have ideas but do not share or propose them. We noticed that the less innovative students put more barriers, among them the insecurity was the most cited. As conclusions we have that the life history of the individual allows us to know better their singularities and these are linked to the innovations that they propose and will influence the professional that this will become. We conclude that the students are innovative, but fail to propose for fear of the opinions of others. We did not get any examples of inclusive innovation proposed by them. We believe that what is missing is to motivate and encourage students to feel confident. Once they feel more secure they will propose their ideas and consequently the inclusive innovations.