Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Godoy, Daniel |
Orientador(a): |
Hypolito, Álvaro Luiz Moreira |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
|
Departamento: |
Educação
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/1608
|
Resumo: |
This scientific research is a case study, which examined the education management and control of performance in Brazil through the case of the Index of Basic Education Development - IDEB established by Presidential Decree 6094 of 2007. The case of IDEB was studied by means of trimming the institutionalization process, for observation of their status as informational and device control, seeking to understand how this device is now operated as a political technology governance education. The methodology used, therefore, was the case study complemented by a critical discourse analysis, used to analyze the speeches and the statements found on the fluidity of discursive communities in ORKUT ®, texts of interviews with experts, newspaper articles and politics texts. In this study, we identified the articulated presence in the educational politics texts and in the content of research on educational inequalities, and the presence of speeches about field arrangement and discourses about the geographies of opportunities. It was therefore possible realize and reveal, marks of a new phase of rationality in educational planning focused on the control and regulation of education through the use of performativity and management, as tools of political language and technologies of governance policies which trend to promote inter-sectoral policies and public policy programs. Thus, in the first decade of this century, two political technologies stand out: Performativity and management for governance. And as the institutionalization of counter IDEB, it was observed that its effect on the performative public discourse, instead of promoting a national mobilization on behalf of education trends to have opposite effects. The IDEB manifests with the voices of teachers and the population as a device for disqualification and depreciation of education |