Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2013 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Schneider, Daniela da Cruz |
Orientador(a): |
Vieira, Jarbas Santos |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Pelotas
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação
|
Departamento: |
Educação
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/1657
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation approaches three different fields of knowledge: education, philosophy, and art. Under the problem Which the powers of the concept of minor pedagogy to Visual Arts Education?, aims to deploy and present the concept of minor pedagogy, using it to interrogate the field of Visual Arts Education. In contrast, the model of higher education of the Visual Arts Education, expressed by the Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais of the area, with the possibility of a minor pedagogy. The minor pedagogy is understood as practices that divert, undermine and undo the claims of a higher education. A higher education is that engendered by that legitimizes by a macropolitics educational policies, parameters and guidelines, etc. The concept of minor pedagogy minor was drafted by Sílvio Gallo, from the book Kafka for a minor literature of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, in which these create the concept of minor literature. Both concepts have three coefficients: desterritorialization, political branch and collective value. This dissertation preserves such coefficients, but throws four propositions about the concept of minor pedagogy: I) The minor pedagogy works as a war machine in the educational territory; II) the minor pedagogy is rhizomatic; III) the minor pedagogy works through a micropolitics; IV) A knowledge of experience is a minor know. The study developed as bibliographical research. The central theoretical tools and dizzying write-downs signal in the thought of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, Michel Foucault, Jorge Larrosa and Sílvio Gallo. |