O limite do crescimento econômico com equidade social na perspectiva neodesenvolvimentista no Brasil
Ano de defesa: | 2016 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil Serviço Social Programa de Pós-Graduação em Serviço Social UFPB |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/14132 |
Resumo: | The dissertation develops the discussion between fighting poverty, income transfer, social equity and job insecurity. In order to analyze the income transfer programs to combat poverty in neo-developmentism the perspective of social equity by way of casualization of labor relations. Specifically, the objectives revolve around the debate casualization of labor relations and its relationship with neodesenvolvimentista prospect of economic growth with social equity in Brazil; verification of how the income transfer programs work to combat poverty in Brazil as a playback mechanism of the workforce; and, finally, demonstrate that neodesenvolvimentista proposal for economic growth with social equity to combat poverty plays a qualified army of precarious labor force in contemporary times, making note of the limits of the proposed economic growth with social equity. Sustained hypothesis is that the promotion of economic growth with social equity proposed by neo-developmentism finds itself its limits, for the development of the productive forces necessary for economic growth tends to lead to the expulsion of the workforce and promoting qualification of workers in order to provide them with the conditions to compete in the market, ends up increasing your working condition precarious and exploited, subjected to the most degrading forms of use of its workforce, and subjugates the share of workers employed the most severe operating conditions. Our research is of theoretical character, and therefore, to build the same worked through the readings, analysis and systematization of the major works that deal with the theme, making a historical review of past forms of precarious work, based Capital (book I) Marx, until we reach the contemporary forms, the main references of the authors Ricardo Antunes, Giovanni Alves, Luciano Vasapollo and Grace Druck; to the debate on social equity, we use the concept of social justice elaborated by John Rawls. And to support our hypothesis, we still use secondary data available, among others, by IBGE, DIEESE, IPEA, MDS / MDSA, ECLAC, UN and ILO. Regarding the methodology we used the historical dialectic method which seeks a real grasp of the facts, that is, beyond the apparent, investigating the essence of objects through successive approximations of reality. |