Uma investigação filológico-linguística das influências do ibero-romance na obra Qvod Nihil Scitvr, de Francisco Sanches

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Souza, Adílio Junior de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba; Brasil; Linguística; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Filologia românica; Ecdótica; Linguística histórica; Latim; Latín; Ibero-romance; Romance philology; Ecdotic; Historical linguistics; CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/18369

This thesis realizes an investigation as much philological as linguistics of the marks of romance languages present in the philosophical charter That nothing is known, written in the 16th century by the Spanish scientist Francisco Sanches, called the sceptic. We searched to know the life and the work of the scientist, especially with reference to the period of scripture of this work; we effectuated the establishment of the research corpus since the textual criticism; we verified the textual signals that indicate marks of the ibero-romance; finally, we realized a commented analysis of samples collected in the corpus. The corpus selected for this research is from an edition fac-similar of Quod Nihil Scitur available by Biblioteca Nacional Digital de Portugal (denominated QNSS-BNP). For the theoretical framework of this research, the following authors were consulted: Coutinho (1981), Sousa da Silveira (1960), Nascentes (1954), Silveira Bueno (1946), Silva Neto (2004), Coseriu (1978) Andersen (1973), Cardoso (1993), Spina (1994), Ilari (2018), Leite (2009), Miranda Poza (2019), Vidos (2001), Bassetto (2005), Elia (2004), Spaggiari and Perugi (2004), Faraco (2006), Mattos e Silva (2008), Garcia (2008), Auroux (2009), Massini-Cagliari (2007), Garcia and Ottoni de Castro (2010), Câmara Júnior (2011a), Teyssier (2014), Banza and Gonçalves (2018) and Bossaglia (2019), and others. Others editions of Quod Nihil Scitur in romance languages were appreciate: Sanches/Sanchez (1923, 1977, 1984, 1988, 1991, 1999, 2006). Firstly, it was realized a literature review about Historical Linguistics, Romance Philology and Ecdotic, respective theoretical objects and central concepts, as well as a brief historiographical review of the life and work from Spanish thinker. Then, the corpus was established with a critical appreciation of the 54 forms mentioned in the errata sic corrige. Two methods were adopted: the comparative method, of Historical Linguistics/Romance Philology and the textual criticism method, of the Ecdotic. And, finally, 50 lessons were extracted of the work. The analysis followed the next stapes: fac-similar fragment of the version QNSSBNP; lesson with paleographical transcription; listing in footnotes with meaning obtained from bilingual dictionaries; lesson transcribed of translation made by Mellizo (1977); lesson transcribed of translation made by Vasconcelos (1991); translation direct of the latin and respective comments about the marks of the romance languages found. The results indicate that: the text of Sanches is written in a latim medievo-bárbaro; there is a presence of romance/iberian substrate, indicated by the lexicon and syntactic order the words; the syntactic order reflect more romance languages that the latin language; there is an excessive use of the prepositions that suggest analitism; in the text were found metaplasms from vulgar latin; there are abbreviations and graphic accentuation similar with others romance manuscripts (Grammatica latina, by Arauio, 1627, medieval songs, indicated by Massini-Cagliari, 2007, Os Lusíadas, by Camões, 1572, etc.); the diacritics in the text suggest a didactical written to pronunciation; the text has a didactic tone/style to reading.