limitações digitais cognitivas: estudo experimental sobre autoeficácia, feedback e desempenho em tarefa decisória apoiada por computador

• Ano de defesa: 2014
• Autor(a) principal: Serpa, Malu Lacet
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba; Brasil; Administração; Programa de Pós Graduação em Administração; UFPB
• Palavras-chave em Português: Limitações digitais; Autoeficácia; Excesso de confiança em habilidades computacionais; Feedback; Digital impairments; Self-efficacy; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/3863

An evolution in the concept of digital divide led him to a multidimensional model with differences in usage levels and perspectives. The digital impairments three-dimensional model follows this view and goes further by proposing the term "digital impairments", suggests three types (access , cognitive-informational and behavioral) and promotes analysis from the perspective of an individual and their level of use and adoption of information and communication technologies (ICTs). The relationship between self-efficacy, feedback and performance has proven ambiguously in the literature. Studies are beginning to show a possible, and important, negative or inconclusive relationship between these constructs that can show up as overconfidence on computer skills. While the overconfidence on computer skills can lead to underperform, it is suggested to classify it as a cognitive impairment, referring to an overestimation of the judgment on the ability of an individual to perform a computational task , that obstruct the effective use of ICTs .The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between self-efficacy, feedback and performance in computer-mediated decision-making task. We conducted a true experiment with two groups of undergraduate from UFPB's Management course. The results show differences between the behavior of the control group, the experimental group with positive feedback and the experimental group with negative feedback. The effect of positive feedback caused an increase in levels of self-efficacy and performance, but the negative feedback decreased the level of self-efficacy and increased the level of performance, which showed a better alignment between the two variables through the negative feedback. Cases of overconfidence were identified in digital skills, represented by those with high levels of self-efficacy and low performers and, therefore, treated as digital impairment. Negative feedback is also shown as a better way to align the self-efficacy of the individual with their actual performance