Ventos que cruzam o atlântico: intersecções, violência e subalternidade feminina na poética de Yaa Gyasi

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Gomes, Paulo de Freitas
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba
Brasil
Letras
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras
UFPB
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/33036
Resumo: The objective of this research is to analyze female characters, highlighting the aspects of violence and subalternity, as an analytical category. The work examines the poetic performance of the African author, of Ghanaian origin, Yaa Gyasi. The aforementioned author uses the space of fiction and uses it as a tool to denounce the sociocultural imbalances caused by segregationist behaviors that aim at social fragmentation in order to preserve the status of supremacy. The intersection of indicators of subalternization, such as race, social class, gender, nationality and ethnic origin, are mechanisms used for the effective exercise of hegemonic institutions, legitimized by the patriarchal regime that gives the male entity decision-making power, leadership and moral authority over marginalized social layers. To consolidate the theoretical-argumentative measurements, we use the novel Homegoing (2017), as a corpus of analysis. The development of this thesis is relevant to the promotion of further studies in the field of literary theory, as well as expanding the critical-expository contributions related to post-colonial and gender reflexive interventions. In this way, we contribute to promoting the critical fortune inherent to the novelist Yaa Gyasi and provide, in the space of academic discussion, the products of her creative disposition. That said, in order to legitimize the argumentative assumptions and systematize the discussion, we resorted to the theoretical conjectures of AIDOO (1983, 2009), ACHOLONU (1995), AMADIUME (1987), ARNDT (2002), COLLINS (2019), DAVIS (2016), HUDSON-WEEMS (2020), BONNICI (2000), BHABHA (2014), BAMISILE (2021), ACHEBE (2012), ALENCASTRO (1998), MBEMBE (2014), APPIAH (2012), FANON (1968, 1983), among other epistemological frameworks necessary for the evolution of the thesis.