Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Nicoletti, Andrelise Maria |
Orientador(a): |
Moraes, Cristina Machado Bragança de |
Banca de defesa: |
Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza,
Colpo, Elisangela |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Franciscana
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Mestrado em Ciências da Saúde e da Vida
|
Departamento: |
Ciências da Saúde e da Vida
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://www.tede.universidadefranciscana.edu.br:8080/handle/UFN-BDTD/714
|
Resumo: |
Objective: to evaluate the level of environmental stress and quality of life of Brazilian perfusionists. Methods: it is a quantitative research with a cross-sectional observational design. The eligible participants were the Brazilian perfusionists in active situation. The data collection was carried out from September 2017 to February 2018 through an electronic questionnaire. The research instruments include: demographic and professional profile questionnaire, adapted nurses' stress inventory and the Short-Form Health Survey scale -SF 36 quality of life. Results: the analysis of the role of career stressors presented a significant difference between professionals with weekly workload of up to 30 hours and 30 to 40 hours (p = 0.005). Between the two groups it was observed that the professional working less than 30 hours (26.56 ± 7.04) had a lower level of stress than the group that worked between 30 and 40 hours (31.31 ± 8.14; p = 0.005). This factor also showed a significant difference between the adult and adult workforce and the pediatric workforce (p = 0.03). Among these groups, it was observed that the professional working with adults (30.19 ± 8.49) had a higher level of stress when compared to the adult and pediatric group (23.62 ± 6.33; p = 0, 03). In the intrinsic factor of the work there was a significant difference between those who do and do not take warning (p = 0.032). In the analysis between these two groups, we noticed that the professional who was on remission (49.2 ± 13.74) presented a lower level of stress when compared to the group that did not pay attention (54.68 ± 13.29; p = 0.032). There is a significant difference between the physical and mental components. In the physical component the difference is between the professionals with low and high level of stress, evidencing that the people with low level of stress present a better quality of life when compared to the people with high level of stress. In the mental component, there is a significant difference between professionals who have low and moderate stress levels and between moderate and high stress levels. Conclusions: perfusionists with low stress present higher quality of life when compared to those with high stress levels. |