Conceitualismo e lida absorvida: o debate entre John McDowell e Hubert Dreyfus

• Ano de defesa: 2018
• Autor(a) principal: Daniel Mendes Campos Xavier Debarry
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; UFMG
• Palavras-chave em Português: Não Conceitualismo; Lida Absorvida; Dreyfus; Conceitualismo; Normatividade; McDowell; McDowell, John, 1942-; Dreyfus, Hubert L; Filosofia
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-B76FVG

This thesis examined the so-called McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. The first chapter presents McDowell´s conceptualist thesis. The second chapter deals with the debate itself, having as background an analysis of the way Dreyfus reads phenomenologists such as Martin Heidegger and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in his attack on McDowell. In addition, it presents the way McDowell provides a response to Dreyfus based on the idea that concepts are in constant operation in perceptual experience. Contra Dreyfus, the third chapter presents conceptualist readings of Heidegger´s philosophy, as well as it strives to provide an approximation between McDowell and the German philosopher on the basis of the notion of normativity. We conclude our work showing certain possibilities of a middle ground to the debate.