Desenvolvimento sustentável nas compras públicas: análise comparativa entre a Diretiva Europeia 2014/24/UE e a Lei nº 14.133/2021, visando superar as dificuldades de aplicação da lei brasileira

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Bruno Fontenelle Gontijo
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Brasil; DIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITO; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito; UFMG
• Palavras-chave em Português: Compras públicas; Desenvolvimento sustentável; Diretiva 2014/24/UE; Lei nº 14.133/2021; Direito administrativo; Licitação pública; Contratos administrativos; Direito comparado - Brasil - União Europeia
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/77624

This study investigated how Brazilian Law No. 14,133/2021 and the European Union Directive EU/2014/24 address the theme of sustainable development in public procurement, aiming to overcome the difficulties in the application of Brazilian law. The proposed study was conducted using the dogmatic-legal methodological approach, encompassing comparative, exploratory, and propositional types. Regarding comparative law, the technique of microcomparison was adopted using the analytical method. The theoretical framework used was Juarez Freitas (2019) concept of sustainability, understood as a principle that seeks to promote social, economic, environmental, ethical, and legal-political development with the aim of ensuring favorable conditions for the well-being of present and future generations. As a result of the comparison, it was found that both legal frameworks consider a variety of issues related to sustainability in public procurement, especially in the environmental and social areas. Furthermore, the Brazilian law is more detailed concerning sustainability criteria in the preparation of tenders compared to the European Directive. On the other hand, the European standard has a more sophisticated system of sustainable choice criteria compared to the Brazilian system, partly due to its comprehensive view of the life cycle of the object, as well as the existence of the economically most advantageous tender criterion. Regarding difficulties, the literature on the subject identified: the claim of a lack of sufficient human capital to conduct the complex institutes of the New Law, the lack of regulation of sustainable norms, few national provisions on the subject, and, finally, the potential increase in price and decrease in competition resulting from the use of sustainable tenders. This work seeks to shed new light on the topic of sustainable tenders, listing proposals to better use it in Brazil, either due to the difficulties in the application of Brazilian law or through the comparative experience of the European Union.