Avaliação da metodologia de obtenção de custos de recuperação de danos em edificações causados por inundação em relação à profundidade de submersão
Ano de defesa: | 2015 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUBD-A5AFJP |
Resumo: | This dissertation is about a analysis of a methodology of evaluating costs concerning the recovery of damages caused in buildings by flooding, proposed by the working group of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). This research was planned to be developed through the use of the Delphi methodology, which consists of a technique to improve the use of expert opinion on technology foresight. They were the object of study of the amounts of services required tables for the recovery of damages caused by flood, which led to proposals damage recovery cost curves in the assessed cost evaluation methodology. The experimental part of the work consisted of structured interviews with construction experts in order to validate or not the cost methodology studied. Presential interviews with construction experts were carried out, both the market and the academic field, which aims to take a interdissiplinar approach to research provided for in Delphi methodology. For operational reasons, this work could not achieve some of the requirements prevised in the methodology, and for this reason, treatment of results attempting to ratify the proposed methodology of the modeling was done qualitatively, without the use of statistical tools recommended in methodology Delphi. Although this study can not validate or invalidate the methodology studied, the results obtained in the interviews were significant and can be used to refine the methodology and found for improvement of the research and realization of new rounds of interviews. |