Ressemantização da fundamentação em Theodor W. Adorno
Ano de defesa: | 2018 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-B3VG5K |
Resumo: | The text presented in this volume seeks to understand the theme of grounding, in Theodor W. Adorno (1903-1969), through the methodological procedure of resemantization. The works in focus are the Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947), written in partnership with Max Horkheimer (1895-1973), and the Negative Dialectic (1966). It was tried to establish a temporal arc between the works, having as reading key the object of this work. In this arc, one can noticed a coherence in suspension, where changes in the diagnosis of time inflexion comprehension of the problem of the grounding. On the side of the Dialectic of enlightenment, one finds the problem of the referentiality of language, which becomes increasingly abstract, the more it remodels itself in the sense of enlightenment. On the other hand, in the Negative Dialectic, there is a need to resemantize knowledge, according to the "primacy of the object". As a result of these two contours given to the problem of the grounding, one arrives at the understanding that Adorno establishes a resemantization of the concept of grounding, with respect to the philosophical tradition. It can no longer be understood as an element of clarity and distinction, constituted by reason, to derive the system of scientific-philosophical knowledge. In Adorno's inflected understanding, the grounding is understood as the material, concrete basis of both language and knowledge. This basis is the historical-natural constitution of man, in common with nature, which always keeps the subject-object relationship in tension. From this we conclude that the materialistic aspect of this relation is the grounding given to knowledge, in Adorno. This materialism, on the one hand, is conceived as a driving condition present in the subject and in the object, on the other, the materiality of the historical-social process, which is the very mode of this relation between subject and object. |