Poder coordenador e coordenação dos poderes, um exercício de história dos conceitos: de Alberto Torres à Constituição de 1934

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2022
Autor(a) principal: Allysson Eduardo Botelho de Oliveira
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Brasil
DIREITO - FACULDADE DE DIREITO
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
UFMG
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/47229
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-5823-2133
Resumo: The object of this research is the semantic history of the concepts of coordinating power and coordination of powers. It is, therefore, a historical-legal research. Structured from the theoretical-methodological axis of the History of Concepts, by Reinhart Koselleck, the general objective of this research is to investigate the semantic continuities and discontinuities that characterized these concepts in the period that extends from the proclamation of the Republic, in 1889, to the promulgation of the 1934 Constitution. Thus, it was investigated (1) how these concepts were used by newspapers and books during the First Republic; (2) how the concept of coordinating power is outlined in the work of Alberto Torres; (3) how the concepts studied were used in the years that preceded the Constitution of 1934 (1931-1934), analyzing the newspapers and publications of this period, as well as the program of constitutional revision elaborated by Oliveira Vianna at the request of Juarez Távora, and the debates held in the Itamaraty Subcommittee; (4) how the terms coordinating power and coordinating powers were used in the constituent debates of 1933-1934. It was concluded that throughout the analyzed period (1889-1934), the concepts of coordinating power and coordination of powers underwent semantic changes, harboring different ranges of meaning. In this time lapse, such concepts were weapons and objects of political and semantic disputes, stressing the space of experience of the First Republic from a horizon of expectations that advocated the construction of a new institutional arrangement, with the creation of a Coordinating Power, which would be responsible for coordinating the powers.