“PÉ NA COVA”, OLHO NA CASA: Um estudo de caso do programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida em Açailândia – MA

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: CARNEIRO, Antonia Eliane Lobo
• Orientador(a): CONCEIÇÃO, Wellington da Silva
• Banca de defesa: CONCEIÇÃO, Wellington da Silva , MATOS JUNIOR, Clodomir Cordeiro de , MARTINS, Maíra Machado , SANTOS, Mariana Cavalcanti Rocha dos
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Maranhão
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM SOCIOLOGIA - PPGS - Imperatriz
• Departamento: DEPARTAMENTO DE SOCIOLOGIA E ANTROPOLOGIA/CCH
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida; Açailândia; Moradia; Jardim Aulidia
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: My House My Life Program; Açailândia; Housing; Jardim Aulidia
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: Sociologia Urbana
• Link de acesso: https://tedebc.ufma.br/jspui/handle/tede/5722

This paper presents a case study of the Minha Casa Minha Vida Program (PMCMV): the Jardim Aulidia Housing Complex or “Pé na Cova” (as it is known, due to its proximity to a cemetery) in the years 2022 to 2024. The neighborhood is located in the city of Açailândia, in Maranhão, with approximately 75,000 m2 (7.5 ha), 2.5 km from the city center, composed of almost 3,000 (three thousand) houses. The research began in April 2022 with floating observation in order to obtain the first information that would allow us to discover the implicit rules that moved the housing complex. In 2023, adopting participant observation, from a close and inside perspective, allowing greater proximity to our interlocutors so that we could know, analyze and understand how the relationships, use and appropriation of space occurred, as well as the nuances of housing policies inserted in the neighborhood. Furthermore, the methodological references made it possible to perceive the socio-spatial segregation of the territory where the complex is located in the scenario. Likewise, the presence of stereotypes such as stigmas was noted, characterizing them negatively in relation to other groups and individuals from other neighborhoods in the city. In this context, we were able to perceive that stigmatization also occurred in intra-neighborhood relationships, so that the inhabited block referenced the profile of the neighborhood, as well as the resident, among the residents. Consequently, we also perceived the existence of an internal territorial hierarchy in the complex based on the differences between the residents themselves in the actions of distinction, which varied between changes in the infrastructure, as well as the presence of elements that added economic value to the aesthetics of the property and the inhabited area. To this end, observations and conversations together with theoretical concepts allowed us to identify uses and appropriations of space based on the analysis of the social relations of the actors who reside in the housing complex, thus making it possible to understand how the social dynamics of the neighborhood are developed.