Prevalência de tempestade elétrica em pacientes chagásicos portadores de cardioversor desfibrilador implantável

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2011
Autor(a) principal: Lima , Antônio Malan Cavalcanti lattes
Orientador(a): Rassi, Salvador lattes
Banca de defesa: Rassi , Salvador, Afiune Neto , Abrahão, Freitas Júnior , Aguinaldo Figueredo de, Barbosa, Maria Alves
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde (FM)
Departamento: Faculdade de Medicina - FM (RG)
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5717
Resumo: Background: Chagas’s heart disease remains a major public health problem in Brazil. Sudden death is the leading cause of decease, because of that, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has become an important therapeutic option in this disease. Objective: To define the prevalence and predictors of electrical storm (ES) in patients with Chronic Chagas Heart Disease (CCh) with an ICD. Methods: We retrospectively studied 81 consecutive patients with CCh in whom an ICD was implanted between January 2004 to December 2007, with a mean follow up of 45,9 ± 15 months. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of ES episodes. We compared baseline and funcional characteristics. p values less than 0,05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Thirty five patients (43,2%) developed TE during follow up. By univariate analysis, QRS width ≥ 150 ms (p=0,001), previous pacemaker (p=0,001), ventricular tachycardia (VT) for indication of ICD (p=0,001) and cumulative percent ventricular pacing (C%VP) > 40%/80%) were all predictors of TE. However, by multivariate analysis only the indication of ICD for VT (odds ratio (OR) = 9.16, 95% CI: 1.98 to 42.78, p = 0.005) and C%VP > 40%/80% (OR = 6.30, 95% CI: 1.56 to 25.49, p = 0.010) were independent predictors of TE. Conclusion: 1- ES is very frequent in subjects with CCh and ICD; 2- Indication of ICD for VT and C%VP > 40%/80% were independent predictors of TE.