Autointegração jurídica: uma reconstrução formal do problema das lacunas no direito

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Matheus Gabriel
• Orientador(a): Schang, Fabien Georges Jacques
• Banca de defesa: Schang, Fabien Georges Jacques, Serbena, César Antônio, Leite, Alexandre Fernandes Batista Costa
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: eng
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia (FAFIL)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Filosofia - FAFIL (RMG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Sistema jurídico; Completude jurídica; Lacuna jurídica; Lógica jurídica; Lógica multivalorada
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Juridical system; Legal completeness; Legal gap; Legal logic; Multivalued logic
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO::TEORIA DO DIREITO
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13193

The concept of a legal gap is studied from various semantic methods and both formal and informal perspectives. Observing that heterointegrable legal gaps are the ones that effectively generate problems of incompleteness in law, the study investigates the use of closure rules as a tool to ensure the completeness of legal systems, starting with Bobbio’s idea of exclusive general norms. Considering that jurists envision two classical closure rules, the principle of permission and the principle of prohibition, Woleński’s work is used to evaluate these principles in light of SDL, concluding that this logic is unable to formally differentiate these two principles. From there, research is conducted on how various renowned authors (Raz, Alchourrón, Bulygin...) have formalized legal gaps, observed the completeness problem, and applied closure rules. Finally, a proposal to use the logic AR4L , along the lines of truth-logic of Von Wright and Fabien Schang’s epistemic justification criteria, is presented. This consists of a four-valued system, where normative sentences Sp are read as promulgations, and the deontic interpretation depends on which legal system the legal proposition was promulgated. In summary, a multivalued formal treatment of closure rules will be proposed after reviewing the available literature in the logic of legal systems.