Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Jonathas Ferreira
 |
Orientador(a): |
Hur, Domenico Uhng
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Hur, Domenico Uhng,
Silva, Elisa Alves da,
Cassoli, Tiago,
Lacerda Júnior, Fernando,
Lima, Priscila |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia (FE)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Educação - FE (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/9505
|
Resumo: |
The psychological practices were introduced in the Brazilian judiciary in the middle of a historical, social and political context of colonization of the ways of life. Among the main events that stand out is the constitution of a legal repressor apparatus, which was forged from the colonial period to the Republic, and the project of social hygiene from the nineteenth century. This study had a main proposal on the discourses of psychologists who work in a Brazilian state judiciary, with the purpose of experiencing their work process, with a purpose of analysis as continuities or discontinuities of the policies of psychology, taking into consideration the particularities of the emergence of this field of Brazilian non-judicial knowledge. More specifically, we intend to reflect on a political policy of the functions of psychologists, considering the multiplicity of forces through which they are traversed. To this end, he holds a group meeting with the actual psychologists who work in the judiciary in question. The subordinate, docatilization, perform and dissident discuits. The first three are found alongside the professionals, being constituted by the social and institutional foundations that transpose a professional translation, and the last one refers to the discourses of contestation and resistance to colonization operated by the logic of the state. It concludes that the practices are multifaceted, and that they are located in the interbreeding of a heterogenous field of forces. Most of the malaise, which go against the reproduction of practices of adjustment and discipline, were highlighted, but the speeches also assumed characteristics of a practice that was the subject of a debate, in which it manifests a project of autonomy. |