Expressão de osteocalcina e de receptores da calcitonina e glicocorticoide em lesão central de células gigantes do complexo maxilo-mandibular

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2015
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Allisson Filipe Lopes lattes
Orientador(a): Mendonça, Elismauro Francisco de lattes
Banca de defesa: Mendonça, Elismauro Francisco de, Nonaka, Cassiano Francisco Weege, Silva, Maria Alves Garcia Santos
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Odontologia (FO)
Departamento: Faculdade de Odontologia - FO (RG)
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5042
Resumo: The Central Giant Cell Lesion (CGCL) is an intraosseous lesion that can be classified into non aggressive and aggressive. Due to the aesthetic and functional defects of surgical treatment of CGCL, therapies with drugs have been reported, such as glucocorticoid injections and calcitonin. The studies reported in the literature support the use of these drugs through the investigation of the presence of glucocorticoid receptors (RGC) and calcitonin (RCT) in CGCL; however there is no consensus if all lesions express these receptors and if there is any difference between non aggressive and aggressive lesion. In addition, there are no studies that evaluated the bone formation potential through the investigation of Osteocalcin (OC) in aggressive and non-aggressive lesions. The aim of this study was to compare, using immunohistochemistry, the GR and CTR and osteocalcin protein (OC) expression in non aggressive (n = 20) and aggressive (n = 11) CGCL, and the correlation between the OC expression and these receptors determined in both groups of lesions. The number of mononuclear cells in mitosis (MOC), and the number of multinucleated giant cells (MGC) were also investigated using immunohistochemical techniques (hematoxylin and eosin). Our results show that all the cases express the GR and CTR and that there is no difference in the expression of these receptors or the number of mitosis between non aggressive and aggressive lesions. The OC expression was rare and higher in non aggressive lesions, however, not statistically significant (p> 0.05). There was a correlation between the CTR expression in MOC and MGC (r = 0.45; p <0.01). Considering the different variants of CGCL, there was a correlation between CTR expression in MOC and MGC in non aggressive lesions (r = 0.66; p <0.01) and between the CTR and OC expression in MGC (r = 0.718; p = 0.01). There was a higher number of MGC in aggressive lesions (p = 0.01). The results indicate that all cases express GR and CTR and that there are no differences between non aggressive and aggressive CGCL lesions of these receptors expression, these results strengthens CGCL treatment with glucocorticoids and calcitonin. Aggressive lesions have a higher number of MGC. The CGCL express glucocorticoid and calcitonin receptors and this finding give biological basis to the CGCL treatment with intralesional glucocorticoid and calcitonin either in non aggressive and aggressive cases. It was also identified osteocalcin positive cells, that may be related to bone repair, it is believed that these cells may also serve as a therapeutic target.