Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2024 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Roberta Coelho dos
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pfrimer, Matheus Hoffmann
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Pfrimer, Matheus Hoffmann,
Suarez, Marcial Garcia,
Botelho, João Carlos Amoroso |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Politica (FCS)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RMG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/13360
|
Resumo: |
Considering the concerns regarding the resurgence of extreme-right terrorism presented by government authorities and terrorism theorists, this thesis’ main objective is to answer the following question: ‘To what extent is extreme-right terrorism considered a major threat by security policy makers?’ The research proposes a comparative study of the national counterterrorism strategies of Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom and aims to identify possible changes in their scope, as well as the adoption of measures specifically aimed at confronting extreme-right terrorists. The investigation has a descriptive nature; qualitative approach; and, applies bibliographic and documentary review techniques followed by comparative study. The comparative study of policies, concentrated on the 2011-2021 time horizon, seeks to assess whether publicly expressed concerns regarding the expansion of extreme-right terrorism materialized in a reorientation of security policies in the analyzed countries and to what extent possible changes in counterterrorism approach were effective in reducing the number of terrorist attacks based on this ideology. Methodological limitations identified throughout the research are: the lack of consensus regarding the definitions of terrorism and the extreme-right; and, consequently, the absence of standardized and comparable statistical data. This research concluded that, although the counterterrorism strategies of the sample were effectively reoriented to cover extreme-right terrorism, this occurred late and at different levels of organization and depth. The evolution, assessment and treatment of the threat were influenced by specific elements such as historical aspects linked to racial segregation and the adoption of extensive immigration and refugee policies. In all cases, the statistical data collected demonstrated that the efforts adopted within the time horizon examined were not sufficient to contain the growth of the extreme-right, which continued to expand. In the three countries in the sample, the mainstreaming of extreme-right discourse and the beginning of processes of delegitimization of the Democratic State were observed, as well as state negligence in assessing non-Islamic terrorist threats and adopting specific counterterrorism policies to address them |
