Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2004 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Anyfantis, Spiridon Nicofotis
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Santos, Nivaldo dos
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Santos, Nivaldo dos,
Castilho, Ela Wiecko Wolkmer de,
Barbosa, Licínio Leal |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Penais (FD)
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito - FD (RG)
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/6866
|
Resumo: |
It concerns an essay about the evidences in the penal procedure and its way of production by means of image captation and recordings, whether by hidden cameras or safety ones. It´s composed of five chapters which analyses, respectively, the penal evidence in its particularities and afterwards, the theme of the illegal evidences making, inclusively, a counterpoint between proof illicitness and the proportionateness principle. It still studies the theme of exceptions to the theory of illegal proofs – named by argentinean and spanish exception of the exclusionary rule. They´re studied, briefly, intimacy aspects and individual private life, with subtle distinctions and similarities. Soon after it goes to an analyses regarding the original image recordings evidence – by ostensive cameras and hidden ones – and its use in the penal procedure, specially when used in work places, investigative journalism, private and public places among other circumstances. Finally, such images validity hypothesis are evaluated in the penal procedure and suggestions are presented in order to them, in case of being produced, and in very specific cases, can be effectively used in the process without violation to the intimacy and private life of the individual. |
