Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Bento, Luiz Carlos
 |
Orientador(a): |
Sandes, Noé Freire
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Sandes, Noé Freire,
Gontijo, Rebeca,
Gontijo, Diva do Couto,
Bittencourt, Libertad Borges,
Silva, Luiz Sergio Duarte da |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de Goiás
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-graduação em Historia (FH)
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de História - FH (RG)
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/5400
|
Resumo: |
This thesis reflects on the historical thinking of ManoelBomfim, placing him in the social dynamics of its time. Along the research sought to contextualize the thinking of the author through a horizontal analysis of intellectual production, which is configured as multiple and diverse, having as leitmotiv the pursuit of analytical understanding of the way in his texts, both focused on education and in the historic trials it was thought a national history writing project that seeks to put under other bases the understanding of national training. In this way, we seek to demonstrate how the national question and the discussions on the national education merge in the mind of the author, giving a certain identity that characterises his thinking history that emerges in the first decades of the twentieth century as a historic speech against dominant produced and disseminated by the IHGB. In this sense, his writings, especially his essays of the twenty dialogue critically with the project of writing the history of Brazil produced by institutes, placing itself as an antithesis of this historiographical culture and pointing to new possibilities of production of sense from a dialogue with other elements and symbols, to some extent marginalized, but available on the historical culture of the period. Methodologically seek to interpret a great part of his writings, produced in different times and places from a question problem was understanding: how he thought the national training and the staff of this process? The answer to that question is the element that gives analytical identity for this thesis. |