‘Mas, entre mulheres? Como assim!?’: uma análise antropológica sobre conflitos e violências em narrativas sobre conjugalidades lésbicas em Goiânia

• Ano de defesa: 2020
• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Paula Cristina de Almeida
• Orientador(a): Henning, Carlos Eduardo
• Banca de defesa: Henning, Carlos Eduardo, Dias, Luciana de Oliveira, Amaral, Marcela Carvalho Martins
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de Goiás
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-graduação em Antropologia Social (FCS)
• Departamento: Faculdade de Ciências Sociais - FCS (RG)
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Conjugalidades lésbicas; Conflitos; Abusividades; Violência conjugal; Antropologia urbana
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Lesbian conjugalities; Conflicts; Marital violence; Abusiveness; Urban anthropology
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ANTROPOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tede/11352

In this dissertation, I sought to know, analyze and write about the significant construction processes and experiences lived by women who relate emotionally and sexually with other women. I also tried to understand how dynamics of establishing violence and abuse in the context of lesbian conjugality. To do this, conduct semi-structured interviews and conversations with information about depth with women who live lesbian relationships that they conceive of, in different ways, as violations. When interviewing seventeen women, most of whom define themselves as lesbians, black women (considering black women as identified as black, black or mixed race), in addition to being under 24 years old, from Goiás, with incomplete higher education and living with family income per capita up to two minimum discounts. It was found that there are several and varied conceptions about violations and abusive practices in contexts of lesbian conjugality, as which mainly cover physical, psychological and social aspects. As violations, abuse and abuse reveal themselves as a place of continuous conflict for the exercise and resistance to the exercise of power. The experiences marked by violations and abuse are strongly marked as contextual, relational and conjunctural. And, therefore, such experiences involve a discursive and semantic multiplicity, through variable forms of narrative and meanings. The emerging field experienceis a kind of “central core” in practices that can be understood as violence.