No conflito: a experiência da greve de 2011 protagonizada pelo SINTE - Sindicato dos Trabalhadores em Educação de Santa Catarina
Ano de defesa: | 2020 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
Brasil Campus Chapecó Programa de Pós-Graduação em História UFFS |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | https://rd.uffs.edu.br/handle/prefix/3860 |
Resumo: | This study aims to analyze one of the strikes of education professionals in the state of Santa Catarina that occurred in 2011, when the agenda of the implementation of the national floor of the magisterium was highlightged. It was realized that a set of factors influenced to trigger a process of intense mobilization that reached the highest rate of paralysis in the segment’s history during the long period of 62 days. The objective of this dissertation is to analyze this historial fact seeking to understand the causes and their unfolding within the contexto in which it occurred, using a research methodology based on the literature review of classical autors of the history of the labor movement, the conceptual and historical transformations of the workers’ trajectory of struggle in the general context and in Brazil, specifically the union trajectory of workers in education in the country and in the state of Santa Catarina, until arriving in the contexto of the 2011 strike. The historical fact that we started to analyze is based on documents and data made available by the Union of Workers in Education of the state of Santa Catarina (Site), as well as previously produced publiccations on the subject. This demonstrates not onoy the relevance of this event, but seeks to understand the internal and external factors of the teachers’ organization that influenced the unleashing of intense and lasting paralysis and its dialectical consequences. On the one hand, one observes the success of the movement in relation to the practical and symbolic results, on the other, the polemics and internal factors of dispute of hegemony in the trade union organization in question. Finally, it is noted that work such as this helps to avoid the simplification nof complex events and the need to deepen narratives to forma a consistente discourse, in addition to opening up other possibilities of deepening aspects not yet sufficiently explored. |