A comparison between an existing ad hoc MPA and a prioritization model using the decision support tool Marxan

• Ano de defesa: 2021
• Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Natália Brandão
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo; BR; Mestrado em Biologia Animal; Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais; UFES; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Animal)
• Palavras-chave em Português: Áreas de proteção marinha; áreas prioritárias para conservação; subject.br-rjbn; Zoologia
• Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/15462

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been a broadly used strategy to ensure ecosystem and biodiversity conservation. However, the adoption of ad hoc frameworks in the designing process of MPAs networks have been narrowing down their capacity of conservation by selecting non representative areas where exploitation is restrained and there is least need for protection. In this sense, advances in the Marine Spatial Planning field have led to development of specific decision support tools that help in the Systematic Conservation Planning (SCP) process, which have been demonstrated satisfactory outcomes for selecting priority areas for conservation. This study makes a comparison between an existing MPA, created in an ad hoc context, located in an economically and ecologically important region in South Eastern Brazil, and a prioritization model developed with the software Marxan as an SCP exercise in the same area, using benthic habitats as surrogates of biodiversity. The results showed that the current MPA fails in meeting conservation features’ targets of most of the habitats used as surrogates of biodiversity and does not include any portion of mesophotic reefs representation. Additionally, this perimeter is the region with higher conservation costs for fisheries, which may interfere with the effectiveness of the MPA. On the other hand, the best solution provided by the model is a selection of areas that in the same time meets the conservation features’ targets while aiming at planning units with the least possible conservation costs for fisheries. The results also include a map of the selection frequency of each planning unit, giving flexibility to possible conservation measures adopted. Despite restrictions that using habitats as surrogates for biodiversity and their respective arbitrary targets may bring, the results indicate important areas for more representative conservation measures for the marine region, besides providing a model organized to receive new data regarding ecological and economic matters. This way, it is possible to achieve an efficient SCP for the local biodiversity, with the proper discussions between stakeholders, so that they avoid conflicts in use, and at the same time maintain environmental sustainability.