É a dialética uma ciência política? um estudo político-filosófico do político de Platão

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2023
Autor(a) principal: Corbani, Weriquison Simer
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR
Doutorado em Filosofia
Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais
UFES
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/12467
Resumo: The thesis investigates whether dialectic is a political science in Plato's Statesman. Initially, our focus was to analyze the occurrences of dialectic in the middle dialogues to understand the application of the method of hypotheses, which reaches its peak in the Republic. From there, Plato begins to make use of the method of collection and division, characteristic of his later works. The dialectic in the Statesman follows the same structure as that presented in the Sophist, except for its content. In the Statesman, the central concern is to define the exclusive science of the political man (πολιτικὸς ἀνήρ). But the task of distinguishing the competence of the politician from that of the dialectician is never easy since these themes intertwine throughout the dialogue. Considering this, the study proceeds to examine the fundamental characteristics of both in the context of the weaving paradigm, which is a paradigm for both dialectic (because it employs the syncritic and diacritic operations) and political science (because it weaves differences to produce a quality fabric). We then see, in the course of this analysis, that the production of the civic unity of the polis is only possible because the politician knows how to use a type of practical intelligence (φρόνησις) that is related to a kind of qualitative measure, taking into account opportune timing (τὸν καιρὸν), propriety (τὸ πρέπον), and the just measure (τὸ μέτριον). It is this competence that makes the politician's action prescriptive and directive (ἐπιστατική, ἀρχή). Finally, by showing the distinction and articulation between dialectic and political science, the thesis also demonstrates that the politician is the philosopher of action in practical life.