A questão do sujeito na psicose e as novas institucionalidades da reforma psiquiátrica

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2018
Autor(a) principal: Neves, Mayara Sanazário
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
BR
Mestrado em Psicologia Institucional
UFES
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Institucional
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/9027
Resumo: From a reflection about the reprodution of manicomials pratices in institutions focused on mental health attention, this dissertation interrogates the elements through which the new institutions of the psychiatric reform favors or not the emergency of the subject, as it is defined by the psychoanalysis. Therefore, at first it’s approached the work of Freud with the psychoses and the way that him, especially starting from the Schreber case, send a new look above the symptomatic manifestations of the psychose, understanding them no more as excesses to be silenced, but as a dimension that implies the subject and can support na effort of restoration. Then, with Foucalt that delimits the context that the psychiatry borns in our civilization, as a proper medicine knowledge in the mental diseases, and how, starting from them, the hospitals emerge as a proposal of social adjusting of the madness. It problematizes the efficiency of the psychiatric institutions and the new institutionalities suggested by the brazilan psychiatric reform, analysing, in particular, the Centers of Psychosocial Attention (CAPS). And, by the end, it studies with Lacan the Foreclousure as an operation whereby the significant Name-of-Father is missing in the constitution of the subject and it’s responsable for the constitution of psychosis. Until the conclusion that the task of sieving the singular condition of a psychotic person in the language and the social bond don’t intend only to offer conditions of treatment that is needed for working with the subject in psychose, but at the same time, it becomes a obstacle to the new institutions of the psychiatric reform to not reproduce the manicomial practices that, at the beginnig, they were made to fight against .