Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Moraes, Luana Aparecida |
| Orientador(a): |
Cruz, Gilmar de Carvalho
 |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação (Mestrado - Irati)
|
| Departamento: |
Unicentro::Departamento de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.unicentro.br:8080/jspui/handle/jspui/1153
|
Resumo: |
The proposal of this research is to treat of the self-management, therefore we pursue the following objectives: a) to elucidate the self-management as a project composed of two fronts: the educational and the social, in contraposition to the hetero-management and b) identify the principles of self and hetero-management from the analysis rhetoric within the projects of international organizations. We’ve opted to talk about the UNESCO and the World Bank because materialized symbols of the hetero-management, in order to explain the self-management for what it is not, since it is a project not yet in course in our society. The study is based on the main categories of anarchism (freedom, equality, solidarity, antiauthoritarianism, anti-statism, internationalism, anticapitalism and self-management) for the explanation of the theme and the composition of the criticism to the heteromanagement orchestrated by the so-called “masters of the world” that induce a formation in favor of the capital. It is an exploratory and qualitative type of research, with a documental study and it’s composed of three chapters: the first one treats of the anarchism as a theoretical-practical contribution to the work and its relation with the self-management and the second one is about the concepts of self and hetero-management within the social and educational field besides the activities of the international organizations, while the third chapter talks about the study of their report. We understand that the socio-educational project defended nowadays by the international organizations distance the selfmanagement proposal and that the exit to the hetero-management hegemony is its denial, that means, the pursuit of the self-management as a emancipator project, forged in the breast of counter-hegemonic educative processes. |
