Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Oliveira, Ricardo Lima de
|
Orientador(a): |
Correia Neto, Celso de Barros
|
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa Strictu Sensu em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Humanidade e Direito
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Resumo em Inglês: |
Religion and tributes have always gone together throughout the history of mankind. Religiousness is a remarkable feature of a great part of the world's population. Therefore, the immunity of the temples of any worship is an issue that arouses the interest of the legal community, presenting controversies, and generating diverse considerations, fomented, in particular, by the recent broadening intelligence adopted by the Federal Supreme Court regarding the concept of the expression ???Temples of any worship servisse??? contemplated in the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988, on its article 150, VI," b ". The concepts of "worship" and "temple" are not settled in the national legislation, and it is up to the doctrine and jurisprudence to define them. The secularisation of the State and the tributary immunity over the temples of any worship service raise questions about the constitutional interpretation historically given to the issue and enable of variances over the original intention of mentioned immunity. The main purpose of this study is to answer if the tributary immunity, effectively guarantees the right of freedom of belief of Brazilian citizens is. |
Link de acesso: |
https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2203
|
Resumo: |
Religion and tributes have always gone together throughout the history of mankind. Religiousness is a remarkable feature of a great part of the world's population. Therefore, the immunity of the temples of any worship is an issue that arouses the interest of the legal community, presenting controversies, and generating diverse considerations, fomented, in particular, by the recent broadening intelligence adopted by the Federal Supreme Court regarding the concept of the expression ???Temples of any worship servisse??? contemplated in the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988, on its article 150, VI," b ". The concepts of "worship" and "temple" are not settled in the national legislation, and it is up to the doctrine and jurisprudence to define them. The secularisation of the State and the tributary immunity over the temples of any worship service raise questions about the constitutional interpretation historically given to the issue and enable of variances over the original intention of mentioned immunity. The main purpose of this study is to answer if the tributary immunity, effectively guarantees the right of freedom of belief of Brazilian citizens is. |