Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Tojal, Camila Barros Pereira |
| Orientador(a): |
Araújo, Marcelo Labanca Corrêa de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Nascimento, Rosa Maria Freitas do,
Araújo, André Villaverde de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Mestrado em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Departamento de Pós-Graduação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1705
|
Resumo: |
Access to Justice and the reasonable duration of the process are constitutional guarantees. It is understood, however, that the Judiciary is not the only way to implement rights. In view of the aforementioned guarantees, and the extrajudicial services as ways of accessing justice, legislative innovations were made that started a process of dejudicialization and increased the attributions of the note and registration services, among which, the introduction of the possibility of adverse possession. extrajudicially - Code of Civil Procedure - Law No. 13.105/15. However, in the State of Bahia, there are major obstacles to the effectiveness of the claim to usucapir. In this work, it is intended to discuss, based on a dogmatic study, about this process of dejudicialization, as well as to present the difficulties faced by the notaries and by the users of the Bahia service in the realization of the claim to usucapir. |
