Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Cedano, Rita Fabiana de Lacerda Jota
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Santos, Gustavo Ferreira |
| Banca de defesa: |
Leite, Glauco Salomão,
Gomes, Ana Cecília de Barros |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Mestrado em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Departamento de Pós-Graduação
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/1664
|
Resumo: |
Black communities represent the struggle, the resistance and the resilience of the historical trajectory of the African people in Latin America. Constitutional protection is one of the achievements arising from the protagonism and engagement of black people. Exclusion and racism policies, based on paradigms of economic globalization and neoliberalism, contribute to the erasure of the cosmovision of these communities. This study aims to verify, through the national and international normative/jurisprudential binomial, the existence (or not) of legal procedures that safeguard the right to selfdetermination of black communities, as a result of constitutional protection, that meet the concept of legal pluralism and interlegality, as approaches capable of enabling access to justice, respect for human dignity and maintenance of the cosmovision. In this sense, the specific objectives are: 1) to research the national and international regulations that safeguard the right to selfdetermination of black communities for the protection of the cosmovision; 2) analyze the dominant ratio decidendi of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court, regarding the protection of the right to self-determination of Quilombo communities, in a comparative perspective with the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Colombia; 3) investigate legal procedures, in Brazil and Colombia, that protect the right to self-determination of black communities; 4) compare the legal system of Brazil and Colombia in order to study the different conceptual and normative approaches to the right to self-determination of black communities, as well as to analyze whether Colombia could be a paradigm for Quilombo issues in Brazil. The methodology adopted is the comparative law and the deductive method. It is concluded that, in order to protect the right to self-determination of these communities, legal procedures that assume an intercultural and decolonial legal perspective are necessary, understanding the law based on legal pluralism and interlegality as a way to allow access to justice, respect for human dignity and the maintenance of the cosmovision. |
