As formações imaginárias de João Cabral de Melo Neto: uma análise discursiva de morte e vida severina

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2016
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Márcio José da lattes
Orientador(a): Azevedo, Nadia Pereira da Silva Gonçalves de lattes
Banca de defesa: Barros, Lourival de Holanda lattes, Efken, Karl Heinz lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Católica de Pernambuco
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Mestrado em Ciências da Linguagem
Departamento: Ciências da Linguagem
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/834
Resumo: The aim of this work is to analyse the imaginary formation of João Cabral de Melo Neto in The Death and Life of a Severino in order to verify the usual discourse that he is the poet of reason, reinforced not only by critics and scholars of his work, but even by the writer himself in various interviews. To achieve so, we use some concepts of the French Discourse Analysis, namely, discourse, interdiscourse, discursive formation, ideological formation and imaginary formation, which we discuss with abundant explanations and apply to three parts of the drama-poem The Death and Life of a Severino: a Pernambuco Christmas play by comparing between an irrationalist ideological formation and a rationalist ideological formation. It was also necessary to explain the meaning of the term reason in philosophy, which is not homogeneous; however, we have to take it from a rationalist discursive formation, i.e., like a platonic idea, for, only this way the discourse João Cabral is the poet of reason could make sense. From that perspective, antidiscursive at first, we verify the plausibility of the said imaginary formation of the Pernambucan poet; otherwise, we would have to analyse the discourse reason is a universal , more distant from a relation to literary discourse and the poet. Based on the theory and methodological procedure of Discourse Analysis, our conclusion goes against a thinking tradition, for the existing discourses in the most famous work of that artist reveal the interpellation from irrationalist discursive formations. Besides these aspects, we make a comparison between philology and Discourse Analysis and we demonstrate the reflections of each in the reading of discursive sequences; we still present some contributions that Discourse Analysis can offer as a new literary criticism.