Extroversão da política e introversão dos sindicatos?: o sindicalismo petroleiro entre o novo desenvolvimentismo e a restauração do neoliberalismo (2008-2020)
Ano de defesa: | 2023 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia - PPGS
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Palavras-chave em Inglês: | |
Área do conhecimento CNPq: | |
Link de acesso: | https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/19089 |
Resumo: | This dissertation aims at analyzing the conditions by which oil unionism was able to organize itself in order to shape oil politics courses since 2008. Thus, this research rebuilds such unionism formation process since Petrobras national-developmentalist landmarks in 1950s till the consolidation of oil unionism institutional and discursive power. Moreover, we investigated the recovery of structural and associative foundations of oil unionism power in 1990 and 2000 decades. Such recovery, allowed oil workers to engage in attempts of intervening on the pre-salt regulatory mark process between 2008 and 2010. As far as that was achieved, they revealed their ability of acting strategically and asserting their autonomy concerning the political interest of the cores of different governments, in what regards oil politics and Petrobras management. Up to 2020, the new developmentalism economical guidelines formed a fundamental reference to oil unionism action, direct or indirectly, insisting on the idea that state should expand its participation in oil sector to the utmost, by means of Petrobras investments on the branch. Therefore, they opposed to the reversion of new developmentalism principles in what concerns economic policies directed at oil industry. Nevertheless, the main antagonism to the public company policies, from 2016 onwards, has relied on effervescence of a new solidarity spirit between union bases and board. In February 2020, threatened by the company board privatization agenda, they went on a 20-day strike, the largest since the 1995 historical stoppage. |