Coexistência e conflitos humano-fauna: percepções da comunidade do Parque Estadual do Jaraguá (SP, São Paulo)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2024
Autor(a) principal: Thomaz, Clarice
Orientador(a): Silva, Rosana Louro Ferreira lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Lagoa do Sino
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Conservação da Fauna - PPGCFau
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/20328
Resumo: Human-wildlife relations can be characterized as interactions that can generate positive or negative impacts on wildlife, people, or both. When positive impacts reach both sides of the interaction, cohabitation is established. However, given the complex reality of human relations with wildlife, coexistence is not always achievable. When negative impacts affect both, human-wildlife conflict arises. These conflicts can be managed by seeking to improve the relationship between people and animals, significantly reducing negative impacts, and striving to establish coexistence. In this sense, environmental education can make important contributions by fostering an alignment between concepts, values, and forms of participation on the subject. This investigation aimed to understand elements indicating the community's perspective (staff and visitors) regarding conflicts and coexistence in Jaraguá State Park. To achieve this, we used data from semi-structured interviews, a mixed questionnaire, and Walking Ethnography. We also analyzed conflicts in the region based on wildlife incidents data provided by an institution that assists wildlife in the municipality. The results reveal conflicts primarily related to feeding animals in the Park and the presence of domestic animals in the area. Several actions, mainly educational, were identified as contributing to conflict management toward coexistence. Wildlife incident data align with the community's perception, indicating primates as one of the groups most involved in incidents, especially marmosets and capuchin monkeys. We understand the need for this management to be collaborative and dialogical, considering the participation of the entire community. At the end of the process and based on our results, we aimed to indicate preferred formats and themes for future production of educational materials contextualized to the area.