Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Santos Junior, Aloisio Cristovam dos
 |
Orientador(a): |
Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4201
|
Resumo: |
The employment relationship is particularly favorable for the development of conflicts related to the manifestation of religious phenomena. At the root of all conflict situations with religious bias that arise in the context of the employment relationship, what prevails is a misunderstanding of the configuration of the fundamental right to religious freedom, coupled with sometimes a clumsy interpretation of principles that inform the labor law. The present investigation is an attempt to find appropriate legal responses from the Brazilian constitutional dogmatics, to the problems related to the exercise of religious freedom in the formation, development and termination of employment. It begins with the assumption that religion does not dissociate the religious identity of the individual and that his statement in the workplace translates unequivocal expression of the free development of personality, which is why the sacrifice of religious freedom in favor of creating a religiously neutral workplace goes against the principle of human dignity. In the specific case of Brazil, antagonizing with the Constitution of 1988, either by countering the ideology assumed by a constituent in dealing with the religious phenomenon, is to disregard the reading of the constitutional role of the company. Advocates are therefore a model for accommodation of religious expression to the employment contract that reflects the ideological conception of the Brazilian constitutional text and does not ignore the fundamental right to religious freedom that can be exercised either by the employee and the employer. |