Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2018 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Ferreira, Stéfano Vieira Machado
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Araujo, Clarice von Oertzen de |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20963
|
Resumo: |
The purpose of the dissertation was to analyze the tax benefits from the normative perspective and within the context of the subsystem of the tax law. The method used was the logical and semantic constructivism. A work to explain the term “tax benefit” was made to eliminate the vices of language, ambiguity and vagueness. The starting point to see the phenomenon occurred in the S1 plan – group of prescriptive enunciates – and the definition of tax benefits was obtained as special enunciates-enunciates in relation to the enunciates-enunciates used to build the tax levy matrix rule – RMIT. In fact, a new enunciate-enunciate establishing already existing general or special provisions neither revokes nor modifies them. Thus, both of them shall be valid, effective and applicable. Special legal rules, therefore, shall have preference with respect to their application in relation to general rules. Irrespective of the different names given by the lawmaker to the tax benefits in the broad sense, such as exemptions, tax benefits, zero tax rate, reduction in the tax base, deferral, accelerated depreciation, drawback, presumed credit, the phenomenon is the same. From the perspective of the legal rule on tax benefit, it is possible to note that the tax levy matrix rule doesn’t apply to a given fact. Subsequently, we studied revocation of the tax rules on the tax benefits by the Legislative Branch, which focused more on the abstract and general rules. The phenomenon of revocation was analyzed based on the structure of deontic performers: revocation as locutionary act, revocation as illocutionary act and revocation as perlocutionary act. Finally, we analyzed the annulment of legal rules on tax benefits by the Judicial Branch, i.e., the control of regularity of the rules produced, at which point we conducted a more specific analysis of the individual and concrete rules, in view of the study of themes such as matter adjudged, vested right, perfected legal act, action for relief from judgment, continued relationship and action for review |
