Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Melo, Adriana Fontes
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lier-DeVitto, Maria Francisca
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Linguística Aplicada e Estudos da Linguagem
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/30241
|
Resumo: |
This thesis, which takes a theoretical-clinical approach, discusses the worrying effects that can arise from the structuring human game when the child's bodily expressions of dissatisfaction insist on repetition, without displacement. Admitting the body as a place of registration of disturbing effects, I resort to a clinical event to differentiate an occasional action from a distinctive psychic mark. Specifically, I discuss the reality of the child in relation to weaning, given that stopping suckling, biting, or screaming in front of the breast points to something beyond what occurs in an operation like this. Based on the assumption that a social demand for prevention may be the reason for the generalization of the term “suffering”, with the intention of ethically situating the place that belongs to us in the clinic with babies, I question the naming of “signs of displeasure” as “psychic suffering”. The structural conceptualization of the unconscious is stated in Freud's writings and in Lacan's words. The challenge for psychoanalysts is to produce interventions based on the inventions that clinical experience allows, without losing sight of the specificity of this field, which requires rigor in reading what the baby manifests, especially in terms of time and circumstances. It is about ethically situating the position of the psychoanalyst who receives in treatment a being that does not express himself through words and is brought by an Other — a primordial matrix of meanings, in the opposite direction of a possible imaginary of the exercise of early intervention. Situating Lacan's reference to the Imaginary, Symbolic and Real registers — the three dimensions of the space in which the speaker inhabits — is essential for this work, since it is focused on the analysis of a manifestation reported as the baby. The account that “the baby stopped breastfeeding” stitches the baby's Real with the Other's Imaginary. If the mother symbolically “speaks the baby” via a negative sentence, the infant only has the power of intention” that a message can be validated. I also emphasize the importance of identifying the traumatic thing, the unassimilable, a way that can meet the mystery that is built around the object's fixity, to locate, in the repetition by insistence, a screen, an impoverished expression of response to anguish: an inhibition as lack of mobility of the body to make another movement |
