Tribunal Penal Internacional: prevalência dos direitos humanos e o aparente conflito com a Constituição Federal brasileira

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2008
Autor(a) principal: Prizon, Leisa Boreli lattes
Orientador(a): Silva, Marco Antonio Marques da
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
País: BR
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8107
Resumo: This study aims to examine the International Criminal Court in the face of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988. This Court established by the Rome Statute in 1998, entered into force in 2002 when it was deposited the sixtieth document of ratification required for initiating the work. The Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988 is based on the dignity of the human person, governing themselves in their international relations for the peaceful solution of conflicts, defence of peace and prevalence of Human Rights. Given these pleas and the provisions of Article 7 of the Constitutional Act of the Transitional Provisions, Brazil ratified the Rome Statute in 2002, subject to the International Criminal Court by Constitutional Amendment No 45, 2004. This move to the study of the apparent conflict between the International Criminal Court and the constitutional arrangements taken as obstacles to the effectiveness of the International Criminal Jurisdiction. Among the topics covered are the immunities, sovereignty, the penalty of life imprisonment, extradition and other institutes. The themes were addressed on the basis of the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988