Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2010 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Paula da Rocha e
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Marques, Oswaldo Henrique Duek |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8989
|
Resumo: |
The incorporation of the Treaty of Rome, through Decree No. 4388/02, at the Brazilian legal system, represented the acquiescence of Brazilian State to the creation of a permanent International Criminal Court, able to judge the severe crimes with international reach. However, despite the tremendous advance for the protection of human rights, since the incorporation, a situation of conflict has iniciated: the Treaty of Rome has human rights precepts in legal antinomy with fundamental rights precepts established in the 1988 Federal Constitutionº It discusses, so, if the internal sovereignty is placed in check by international sovereignty. In addition, there are doubts about the own conflicts itself: would these conflicts be real or merely apparent? This dissertation wished to resolve the tension between the precepts, which are: prescrition of crimes vs. non-applicability of statute of limitations; nonextradition vs. delivery; imprisonment for a specific number of years versus a tearm of life imprisonment, less onerous way possible |
