Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Garcia, Roseana Moraes
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Loparic, Zeljko |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
| Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/15895
|
Resumo: |
It is the purpose of this work to present in an ordered way, the human nature aggression and destructiveness from the winnicottian psychoanalytic perspective. Starting from very clear Winnicott criticism on the theme as it was treated by Freud and Klein, a counterpoint to both authors is introduced to express the difference between traditional and winnicottian psychoanalytic propositions, which, in accordance to Khun model, establishes a paradigmatic change. Taking Winnicott personal maturation theory as a reference, the maturation of aggression is studied from its very start point where it is nothing but motility and spontaneity, until it is completely integrated into the individual whole, stressing that, for Winnicott, aggression is always linked to its roots from the separation moment of the me/not-me and that it is valuable, whenever integrated, either for individual psych health and for social psych health. The paper goes on to describe how the pathologies related to aggression are generated longwise maturation as well as the importance of this awareness for psychoanalytic clinical purposes. At last, it is shown how Winnicott used his agression theory to study non-clinic phenomena, enlarging it to social ones like democracy, dictatorship and wars |
