Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Silva, Maria Aparecida Gomes da |
Orientador(a): |
Valverde, Antonio Jose Romera |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Filosofia
|
Departamento: |
Filosofia
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/11830
|
Resumo: |
The present research deepens the current dilemma on the class conflict as elaborated in Marx: have the changes originated from the new technical-scientific phase of capitalism promoted the disappearing of class conflict in the current social organizations? At first, this dilemma is exposed in Kurz, Negri and Hardt, which despite being involved in the Marxist tradition, and willing to understand the transformations of modernity, do not consider the class conflict issue in the social relations of globalized capitalism. Therefore, the purpose of this demonstration was to analyze the class conflict in Das Kapital, and to reveal the fundamental bases of its logical-historic dimension as mentioned by Marx. For this analysis we took into account the ideas of Fausto and Benoit, who studied the work thoroughfully and highlighted the peculiar to the capital-work contradiction in the social configurations of capitalism. The violence of the uneven contract: third-party work appropriacy, without exchange, according to Marx s researchers, leaves classes in opposition. Thus, the experience of spoliation lived by the worker allows the existence of class conflicts. Marx exposes the secret of the value-form: the riches of capital lie in the extraction of more work. Class conflicts are recomposed as Marxist drafts as a real possibility of the end of capital, and the beginning of a new social order the denial of denial. The agitation of work of goods takes Marx to confide the transit of the system. From a human perspective, work is, to Marx, a requirement of active men, and the investigation also deals with the ontology of work from his viewpoint. Based on those reflections, this research establishes the debate with Kurz about the loss of centrality of work and the class conflict in the capitalist modernization. To fulfill the objectives of the research it was crucial to highlighten some aspects in the development of new textile technologies and the productive reorganization to compose a temporary chart of the social form of capital nowadays. The impact of the transformations in its productive molding indicates a repositioning of the ways of work exploration to the endless value change. Based on Marx, the text reassures that the capital does not exist without work, even in the reorganized productive forms in which there was the advance of technology and science. Capitalism is a contradiction in progress: on one side it puts in motion all the forces of nature to diminish work; and on the other side it keeps measuring wealth through work. In the end of the text, the debates with Negri, and Hardt are restarted, to whom the class conflicts was replaced in postmodern times by multitude. Finally, one of the accomplishments of Marx highlightens the remaining of a vital capitalism push the extraction of more work and the class conflict as an alternative to compose the horror and the scandal of the current frame in which capital is inserted |