Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2009 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Cruz, Ricardo Alexandre da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Munakata, Kazumi |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Educação: História, Política, Sociedade
|
| Departamento: |
Educação
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/10729
|
Resumo: |
This work approaches the trajectory of two black professors: José Rubino de Oliveira and Eunice A. J. Prudente. The first one was a saddler in Sorocaba and became a professor at Sao Paulo Law Academy in the 19th century, during the slavery period. The second one was born in the 20th century and, daughter of workers, became the first black woman to teach at Sao Paulo University Law School, besides occupying important positions. This way, the work aimed at identifying the strategies used by these subjects that allowed them to build a trajectory of educational and social ascension. In order to identify the strategies both teachers adopted, we tried to rebuild their trajectories, so the opus of the memorialists of Sao Paulo Academy, Almeida Nogueira (1907-1912) and Spencer Vampré (1977), were used in the case of José Rubino. Regarding professor Eunice, we used the interview. The data analysis revealed that both professor Eunice and professor José Rubino had a group of strategies like using the help of others, that is, the social capital, the public examination strategy, among others. When analyzing professor José Rubino s (in the 19th century) and professor Eunice s (in the 20th century) first steps, we realize that the strategies they used were strong enough for them to reach, at a certain point of their trajectories, a significant volume of cultural and social capital that provided them social ascension. The data also permitted us to realize that all strategies used by professor José Rubino (excepted by his entrance in the seminar) were used by professor Eunice Prudente, despite their trajectories being part of different contexts. This evidence is important because it suggests that some difficulties (revealed by the strategies used by the two subjects) faced by professor José Rubino in the past were similar to the ones faced by professor Eunice Prudente, more recently, as it is presented in this work |
