A regra de impedimento de voto do sócio-credor no plano alternativo de credores

• Ano de defesa: 2023
• Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Felipe Benfato
• Orientador(a): Almeida, Marcus Elidius Michelli de
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Direito empresarial; Direito societário; Direito da insolvência; Direitos e Interesses do devedor; Recuperação judicial; Falência; Direito de voto de aócios e acionistas em assembleia geral de credores; Resolução de conflitos
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Corporate law; Insolvency law; Debtor's rights and interests; Judicial reorganization; Bankruptcy; Voting rights of partners and shareholders at general meetings of creditors; Dispute resolution
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/39361

This dissertation proposes to analyze whether partners/shareholders-creditors of the company under judicial reorganization could vote in a general meeting of creditors convened for the examination of alternative plans presented by creditors, and whether they should be considered for purposes of verification of the quorums for installation and resolution of the meeting. In order to adequately answer this question, it will be necessary to explain the exceptional nature of the restrictions on the exercise of voting rights in the business model of the reorganization process and the grounds for the rule set forth in article 43, main section of the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, in order to understand whether, in the case of the presentation of an alternative plan, the reason for the impediment imposed on the partners/shareholders-creditors of the debtor company persists. This work, therefore, begins with a brief contextualization of the economic and financial crisis and the essentiality of effective corporate liquidation instruments for the maintenance of capitalism. Still in the first chapter, a brief historical retrospective of the bankruptcy mechanisms of the Brazilian legal system will be made, until we reach the institution of judicial rehabilitation, which will be examined in its fundamental concept and legal nature, considering the changes implemented in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law by Law 14.112/2020. Then, using the doctrinaire understandings, the study of the relationship between the partner/shareholder and the company under judicial reorganization will be deepened, especially because the hypothesis under discussion involves a particular situation, in which the companies are, at the same time, partners/shareholders and creditors of the company under judicial reorganization. Next, it is proposed to expose the recently introduced possibility of submission of an alternative plan by the creditors and its hypotheses of suitability. Immediately thereafter, still under the influence of the changes implemented by Law 112/2020 in the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, the new treatment given to credits held by partners/shareholders against the company under judicial reorganization will be verified if they have observed commutative conditions and market rules. Finally, the rules preventing certain creditors from voting - in the context of judicial reorganization and the rationale behind this restriction of rights will be studied, especially the rule set forth in article 43, main section, of the Brazilian Bankruptcy Law, concluding that it is inapplicable when an alternative plan of creditors is presented