Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Melati, Nathalia Martins
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Ferreira, Luiz Antonio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Língua Portuguesa
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20437
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation comprises a study linked to the Reading, Writing and Teaching of Portuguese Language research line and conducts an analysis of the writing proposal of the National High School Examination (Enem), as well as its design and fundamentals, so that it understands which way the teaching of basic components of Rhetoric in the classroom can collaborate with the work of the Portuguese Language teacher in the development of the competences evaluated by the writing test of Enem. For this, this dissertation was based on bibliographical research about Brazilian education, the notion of competence and rhetorical acts. The analysis was carried out from the rhetorical reading of Enem's writing tests from 2009 to 2016 with the purpose of drawing the profile of the speaker, the auditorium and the rhetorical genre required by the evaluation. From this conceptualization, a rhetorical exercise of text production was proposed, with an emphasis on rhetorical invention and disposition, based on the essay writing of Enem 2016. Finally, this research concludes that the teaching of basic rhetorical components can productively collaborate in for the development of the skills required by the Enem writing test. Thus, competence I is contemplated during elocution, since a discourse that respects grammatical rules has more argumentative force. Competency II is developed in so far as Rhetoric encourages the student to seek arguments in all the common places available to the speaker. Competence III is directly related to the rhetorical invention and, therefore, the rhetorical exercise in the classroom makes possible its adequate development. Likewise, competence IV is developed from the disposition exercise, since the creation of the draft of the text is fundamental to the understanding of the importance of the relation between the arguments. Finally, competence V is not fully developed through Rhetoric, but benefited, since the exercise of the production of deliberative discourse presupposes a reflection about the society in which the speaker is inserted |
