Sinal de fumaça: o discurso sobre a maconha no jornalismo científico brasileiro e sua relação com a causa antiproibicionista

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Lygia Maria Silva lattes
Orientador(a): Prado, José Luiz Aidar lattes
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Comunicação e Semiótica
Departamento: Faculdade de Filosofia, Comunicação, Letras e Artes
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/24340
Resumo: The research analyzes, from semiotics and discourse theory, how the subject of marijuana and drugs has been approached by Brazilian print journalism, more specifically in scientific journalism. The corpus of the work is the cover stories of the Brazilian magazines Veja and Superinteressante that address this theme. For the analysis of the material, a theoretical articulation is made between Eric Landowski's interaction regimes and Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's theory of discourse. The objective is to verify the different meaning effects of journalistic texts on marijuana produced by the different uses of interaction regimes and how these meaning effects are articulated with the antagonisms constructed discursively in the midst of the public debate that has been waged about the legalization of marijuana. The hypothesis is that, in magazines in the segment of scientific journalism (Superinteressante), a counterhegemonic discourse has been broadcast regarding the status of marijuana illegality (considering that the hegemonic contemporary discourse about this plant considers it is dangerous and should therefore be prohibited). It was also intended to verify how the anti-prohibitionist discourse articulates elements related to the great theme Economy, notably the liberal and neoliberal economics