Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2024 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Lopes, Guilherme Barcelos Machado
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Pimentel, Silvia
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/41274
|
Resumo: |
The main objective of this work is to provide a theory that systematizes the multiple standards of legal reasoning observable in the application of constitutional rights norms. For this purpose, some secondary objectives will be fulfilled. Firstly, the introduction of logical and formal instruments that are sufficient for the presentation of premises and logical inferences employed within complex constitutional arguments. Secondly, the development of the formal structure of constitutional rights norms, in order to make explicit their deductively relevant components. With this apparatus, the structures of different standards of legal reasoning will be elaborated, and the forms of concatenation of arguments analyzed. The results will then be tested in the light of real legal arguments, and, finally, the degree of systematicity reached by the theory, critically evaluated. The research method will be predominantly deductive, by means of bibliographic research, but with occasional references to legal precedents inductively collected from Brazilian Constitutional Law, in order to confront such precedents with the results achieved by the theory |
