Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2006 |
Autor(a) principal: |
César, Joaquim Portes de Cerqueira |
Orientador(a): |
Alvim, Arruda |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7410
|
Resumo: |
The systematization of exceptional appeals in Parental Rights is notably complex, especially after the promulgation of 1988 Federal Constitution that created the appeal denominated special, aiming mainly at keeping the wholeness of the federal right, remaining the constitutional litigation to the extraordinary appeal. The multiple questions that emerge from the exceptional appeals obliges the interpreter to search for references in a context of parameters that are not almost always systematic, where jurisprudential orientation, abridgements and unequal doctrinal positioning proliferate. The present work aims to approach the issues of exceptional appeals regarding to the Special and Extraordinary Appeals, descrying as basic orientating premises the jurisprudential issues condensed in the Stare Decisis, analyzing the casuistic forensics in the area as well. The objective is to dissipate common errors and to create a general overview of solutions that superior courts have been adopting so that a peculiar jurisdictional tutelage inherent to this mode of exceptional appeal becomes feasible |