Limites da discricionariedade na celebração de acordo de não persecução civil pelo Ministério Público

• Ano de defesa: 2024
• Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Laís Azevedo Barreto Marques Vila- Nova de
• Orientador(a): Oliveira, José Roberto Pimenta
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
• Departamento: Faculdade de Direito
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: Ministério Público; Discricionariedade; Limites; Improbidade administrativa; Acordo de não persecução civil
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: Public prosecutor's office; Discretion; Limits; Administrative improbity; Non-prosecution agreement
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
• Link de acesso: https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/42774

This dissertation deals with discretion of the Public Prosecutor's Office in concluding non-civil agreements (NCA). The aim was to investigate and answer the question of what the limits of this institution’s discretion are when it comes to this type of agreement. Specifically, the issue was examined aiming at (i) to encourage the regulation and execution of the NCA in a more uniform manner in the various branches of the Parquet, guaranteeing social confidence in the institution; (II) to promote a greater degree of legal certainty, both for the parties and for the interested, in cases of administrative improbity that must be resolved by this instrument provided for in Law 8.429/92. We start from the perspective that that Law 14.230/21, by inserting the art. 17-B into the General Law on Administrative Improbity (GLAI), gave the Public Prosecutor's Office a wide margin of discretion regarding the NCA. Thus, the institutional activity, by regulating it and its various branches, has been creating a scenario of heterogeneity towards this consensual instrument, which generates a great deal of legal uncertainty. Therefore, the proposed study was based on theoretical research on the system of functions and attributions of the Parquet, especially when it comes to protecting transindividual interests and, thus, of probity. The study locates the current composition of the system of accountability for acts of administrative improbity and the evolution of consensus in this area and then carrying out a systematic dogmatic study of the NCA and infer which are the limits of the discretion of the Public Prosecutor's Office