Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2008 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Santos, Maria de Fátima Zanetti Barbosa e |
Orientador(a): |
Almeida, Renato Rua de |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Direito
|
Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/8216
|
Resumo: |
This piece of work has the intent of making a critical rereading of the requisites adopted by the major part of the doctrine and jurisprudence on fixation of the value for reparation when it comes to punitive damages. An analysis of those requisites was made with the purpose of showing that some of them are obsolete due to the arrival ofthe Federal Constitution in 1988 and that others should have their application restricted to the repairing of punitive damages, since their origin is and they are connected in the matter ofvalue to the restitutory Law. From the analysis conducted, we conclude that: can not be applied requisites that taper with the restitutory Law; that the punitive damages' purpose protects superior value of alI society' s interest that superposes the material values; that the parts find themselves in situation of inequity when it comes to work contract; that work is essential good for workers and the entire society; and that is why specific requisites are a necessity, as well as the application of the punitive-pedagogic aspect, reaching the prohibitive function of the Law, which, materializes through significant values for reparation |