| Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Martins, Raonna Caroline Ronchi
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Rosa, Miriam Debieux |
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Social
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e da Saúde
|
| País: |
BR
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/17139
|
| Resumo: |
Based on experiences of direct intervention involving homeless people in the city of São Paulo, this dissertation aims at contributing to the debate on new practices and strategies for a clinic that operates on the streets. Considering the vast field of violence, it tries to discuss some possibilities of practice and reflection for the psychoanalyst, debating on intrafamilial violence, police violence etc. Analyzing the tensions and conflicts present in this field and reflecting on both actual public policies and the limits imposed to the ones whom the streets are a place of existence, we try to promote the resignification of the street as a complex territory and the people that live there as speaking individuals. Therefore, we show the ethical and political implications of listening in the formation and recognition of a segregated individual. Therefore, we show the ethical and political implications of listening in the formation and recognition of an individual beyond the segregation. By the position we sustain with psychoanalysis, we also believe creating an identity for this clinic does not ensure its rigor. In that way, we choose to focus on some conditions that help out the configuration of a clinic situation in this context. These advices point out not one defenition about a street clinic , but som experiences that contribute and make public a street clinic experince. We understand the function of apolitical listening as a way to know the other, to make possible to drawn up interventions with the other and not for him |
|---|
