Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2024 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Cunha, Ígor Martins da
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Maia Júnior, Mairan Gonçalves
|
| Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso embargado |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito
|
| Departamento: |
Faculdade de Direito
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.pucsp.br/jspui/handle/handle/41279
|
Resumo: |
This thesis aims to systematically analyze civil appeals from the perspective of private autonomy and the adversarial principle. The specific objective is to examine how private autonomy impacts the admissibility and effects of these remedies. The work is divided into three parts, covering fundamental concepts, the exercise of private autonomy in remedies and their control, and finally, the effects of remedies, the exercise of private autonomy, and the cognition exercised by judicial bodies. The analysis from this perspective is justified because, although doctrine unanimously asserts that the remedy is based on the principle of voluntariness (or considers it a voluntary remedy), when examining its effects, especially one of the most relevant, the devolutive effect, it ends up attributing substantially broad contours that often, in practice, mean disregarding the contours of the expressed will. Therefore, after a comprehensive bibliographic analysis (both national and foreign) and jurisprudential research, we present our proposal for understanding the theme, suggesting that private autonomy should be seen as the core of remedies, directly influencing admissibility and effects. In our work, we conclude that the appeal, considering the Theory of Legal Fact, constitutes a unilateral procedural act (“negócio jurídico”) within the same procedural legal, based on private autonomy. Through this act, a reasoned judicial cognition is sought regarding the existence (from a legal perspective), validity, correctness, coherence, and completeness of the judicial decision rendered, as well as, depending on the case, the request for a new, more favorable decision. Based on this conclusion, we analyze how private autonomy operates in each of the two phases of the merits of the appeals provided by the 2015 Civil Procedure Code. In this analysis, we indicate that the devolutive effect should be understood more restrictively due to the need to value private autonomy |
